If you or a family member were involved in a motor vehicle accident due to the fault of another, we advise you to seek medical attention immediately.
We also recommend as follows:
Uninsured Motorist and Underinsured Motorist Coverage (“UM” or “UIM”) is optional coverage. Like bodily injury coverage (“BI”), UM coverage insures against permanent injuries caused by the negligent operation of a motor vehicle. However, unlike BI, UM provides coverage to the insured, covered family members, and others occupying the insured automobile. Thus, UM coverage is not directed toward insuring losses to third parties as a result of the insured’s own negligence. Rather, UM coverage is directed toward providing benefits to its own insured(s) when injured in an accident with uninsured and/or underinsured motorists. Of course, the UM insurance company essentially becomes the insurance company for the at-fault party to the extent of the UM policy limits.1. Difference Between Bodily Injury Coverage (“BI”) and Uninsured Motorist/Underinsured Motorist Coverage (“UM” or “UIM”)
If the responsible party or parties do not have liability insurance (“BI”) or have insufficient liability insurance, the injured claimant(s) may be entitled to obtain compensation through an uninsured and/or underinsured motorist claim (“UM/UIM”). Stated differently, if an adverse motorist has bodily injury limits that are less than the limits of the insured’s own underinsured motorist coverage, then the adverse motorist’s vehicle is underinsured. Similarly, if the adverse motorist does not have any bodily injury coverage (“BI”), then the adverse motorist’s vehicle is uninsured. Illustratively, if an insured is involved in a collision with an at-fault driver that only has $10,000.00 in bodily injury coverage, and the insured has sustained $100,000.00 in bodily injury damages, then the insured may be able to collect the $10,000.00 from the at-fault driver’s insurance company and make another claim against their own policy for the difference based on underinsured motorist coverage. Thus, assuming the insured had $100,000.00 in UM/UIM coverage (“UM”), an additional $90,000.00 in UM benefits may be available to the insured.2. Illustration of Uninsured Motorist/Underinsured Motorist Coverage (“UM” or “UIM”)
Typically, UM coverage is not available until applicable BI policies are exhausted. However, if multiple claimants exhaust the adverse motorist’s BI limits, then the insured’s claimed difference may be between their own UM/UIM limits and what was actually recovered from the adverse motorist’s coverage. In addition, although the adverse motorist BI limits may equal (or even exceed) the insured’s own UM/UIM coverage, the insured may still be entitled to recover under their own UM/UIM policy in these types of cases. So, in the example above, if the insured only recovered $5,000.00 of the $10,000.00 in BI from the adverse motorist due to settlements involving other claimants, the insured may now seek an additional $95,000.00 under its own policy in UM benefits. The maximum liability for UM/UIM insurance company will not exceed the insured’s UM/UIM coverage limit, less amounts previously paid by the responsible at-fault party or parties. Simply put, the insured can recover the difference between their own UM/UIM limits and the actual amount received from the adverse motorist(s). However, UM/UIM coverage is over and above, not duplicative, of other available benefits. Since UM/UIM coverage was created for the benefit of injured persons and not insurance companies, Florida’s public policy seeks to protect its citizens by affording the broadest possible coverage.
For example, if a passenger was injured in a motor vehicle accident and exhausted the liability coverage (BI) of the driver’s policy in which (s)he was riding, the injured passenger may still be able to collect uninsured motorist coverage (UM) under that driver’s policy if their damages remained unsatisfied and the adverse motorist was uninsured and jointly at-fault. In that case, the UM benefits would be in addition to and not duplicative of the BI benefits. In contrast, an injured passenger may not treat the driver’s policy as both an insured and uninsured for the purpose of stacking BI and UM coverage under the same policy. Consequently, a passenger in a single car accident may not seek BI limits and then demand UM benefits under the same driver’s policy. In a single car accident, the injured passenger is not attempting to collect UM benefits based on a second uninsured motorist’s negligence, which is a critical difference.
If you or a family member were involved in a motor vehicle accident due to the fault of another, the Zaritsky Law Firm has the knowledge and experience to aggressively represent you and protect your rights.
In some accidents, the negligent driver has bodily injury coverage (BI). However, the BI coverage may not be enough to cover your personal injury claim. Moreover, underinsured motorist claims may also arise when several people are injured in the same accident, and the negligent driver’s BI limits are insufficient to fully compensate each of the injured parties. As your attorney, the Zaritsky Law Firm will investigate whether uninsured and/or underinsured motorist coverage is available to you. If not available or available but in a lesser amount than your bodily injury coverage (BI), we will determine if a valid offer, rejection or selection of a lesser amount took place. In the event your insurance is unable to prove that a valid offer, rejection or lesser amount selected took place, then an uninsured and/or underinsured motorist claim may be available to you even if you failed to purchase this type of insurance coverage. Typically, if available, you are automatically provided coverage in the same amount as your bodily injury coverage. In addition to bodily injury coverage, you may also be entitled to coverage for emotional and psychological injuries.3. Investigating Uninsured Motorist/Underinsured Motorist Coverage (“UM” or “UIM”)
First Party v. Third Party Disputes
In general, the claimant's standing in relation to the insurer determines the available courses of action with respect to claims disputes. On a case-by-case basis, the Zaritsky Law Firm will examine who did what to whom, for what purpose, in what context, and their relations between each other (and their insurers) when assessing the nature, scope, and extent of the loss.
1. Available Causes of Action – Claim Disputes
In first party disputes, the claimant or beneficiary seeks damages against its own insurance company. When seeking these damages, the first party claimant or beneficiary levies a state or federal action grounded in contract. The claimant or beneficiary is named the plaintiff and their insurance company is named the defendant. If the first party claimant or beneficiary prevails, the court may award an entitlement to attorney’s fees under Florida Statutes Section 627.428. In contrast, third party liability disputes are handled differently.
2. First Party Disputes
In third party liability cases, the insurer has a duty to indemnify and defend. Whether caused by an insured’s negligence, covered family members, or a permissive user of the insured’s vehicle, the bodily injury liability insurer provides indemnification coverage for injuries caused to a third party or parties. These third party liability disputes generally involve alleged negligence. In these negligence actions, insurance coverage may not be referenced in the action. If referenced, a “mistrial” may occur. Consequently, third party actions appear to only involve disputes between the injured party (or parties) and the at-fault party (or parties). Of course, the at-fault party’s insurer is paying for the defense and responsible for the loss up to the limits of the policy. At times, the at-fault party’s insurer may be responsible for damages in excess of the policy limits provided certain conditions are met.3. Third Party Liability Disputes
In uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage (“UM”) disputes, the injured claimant is a first party and may be an insured or omnibus insured (i.e., beneficiary entitled to benefits under the insured's policy). However, the nature and process of resolving disputes in the UM context is different from other first party cases. If the dispute is over damages (i.e., the amount or value of the insured’s bodily injury claim) and fault, then it is subject to arbitration. In contrast, if the dispute is over coverage, the dispute may be resolved in state or federal court, whether by breach of contract or declaratory relief. Notably, in UM disputes, if the arbitrator issues an award in excess of policy limits, the insurance company may become obligated to pay the full amount of the arbitration award where the insured made a policy limit demand based on reasonably clear liability that was not timely accepted before arbitration.
4. Uninsured Motorist/Underinsured Motorist Coverage (“UM” or “UIM”) Disputes
In property damage disputes, the claim typically centers on how much the property will cost to repair or replace. Consequently, an appraisal process may be used to resolve the claim. In appraisal, each side selects their own appraiser. Thereafter, if an agreement has not been reached, the two appraisers may then select a third neutral appraiser. Collectively, the appraisers will resolve the property damage dispute. If necessary, a lawsuit can be filed to compel an insurer to participate in the statutory or contractual appraisal process.5. Property Damage Disputes
In PIP, the persons covered or their assignees may file suit to obtain benefits due. However, before filing suit, a pre-suit demand letter must be sent that is in compliance with Florida Statutes section 627.736(10). The pre-suit letter provides the insurer notice of the claim and intent to litigate. Once notified, the insurer has thirty (30) days to resolve the claim. If not resolved, suit may be filed. In 2003, mandatory binding arbitration was eliminated in the PIP context. However, non-binding arbitration programs were subsequently implemented in many of the courts.
6. Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) Disputes
Stacked and Unstacked Coverage
Interpreting Insurance Contracts
Choice of Law
Comparative Fault
Will the Claim Be Resolved in Settlement or Trial?
Lawsuits – Overview
In the event settlement is not reached with the at-fault party, parties, and/or their insurance companies, a lawsuit must be filed with the court to protect your rights. Specifically, the Zaritsky Law Firm will prepare and file a complaint setting forth each of your legal theories for recovery against the at-fault party and/or parties. You are the “plaintiff” and the at-fault party or parties is/are the defendant(s). Along with the complaint, a summons is prepared and conformed to notify the opposing party defendant(s) of your claim and the time for their required response.1. Complaint & Summons
Once served, the defendant(s) must respond within the designated time, which is typically twenty (20) days from their receipt of the summons and complaint (i.e., service of process). When responding, the defendant(s) may move to dismiss the complaint (e.g., lack of jurisdiction over person or subject matter, insufficiency of process or service of process, failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, failure to join an indispensable party, venue, or other) or file an answer to the complaint. If the defendant(s) answer(s) the complaint, they must admit, deny, or state lack of knowledge to each of the allegations. Further, the defendant(s) may raise affirmative defenses, file a counter-claim, cross-claim against another party defendant or defendants, or even file a third-party claim against another party (i.e., not a named defendant in the complaint).2. Responses to Complaint
After the lawsuit is filed, the “discovery” process begins, which, in most cases, requires significant time and effort. During the “discovery” process, the parties demand and exchange information that is reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence in trial. More particularly, the “discovery” process may involve the following methods: (1) production requests; (2) interrogatories; (3) requests for admissions; and, (4) depositions. If disputes arise during the “discovery” process, the parties may move to compel the information with the court. If a motion to compel is filed, the court may or may not schedule a hearing to rule on the motion.3. Discovery
At the end of the “discovery” process, one or more of the parties may file a motion for summary judgment (in full or in part) seeking to resolve the case or issues in the case as a matter of law with the court. Essentially, the moving party or parties claim there are no material issues of fact in dispute and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Stated differently, the moving party contends that a particular result is required when applying the facts to the law. If granted by the court, the case or issues in the case are considered resolved unless otherwise appealed in a timely manner.4. Summary Judgment
At some point, the parties may attempt to settle the case through alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”). Some common methods of ADR include mediation (court-ordered or voluntary) and arbitration (binding or non-binding). If an agreement is reached, there is no appeal. If no agreement is reached and no summary judgment granted by the court, the case proceeds to trial. Whether decided by judge or jury, a judgment will be entered based on the facts and law. Any of the parties may appeal the judgment, in full or in part, within a designated period of time (usually 30 days).5. Trial